neverfox wrote:I'm going to have to ruminate on this a bit but at first glance it seems a bit like a defense of implicit consent. I understand that we can't have anarchy without anarchists, but I'm not willing to say that the beaten wife is at fault. I can see this kind of argument being twisted to excuse the state as much as oppose it. Should we really be spending time trying to spread the blame rather than simply opposing those who dominate? I realize that this statement is supposed to be a rallying call to do just that but it seems to unnecessarily play the guilt card.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest