Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
Moderator: Hierophant
38 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Hierophant » Mon Dec 01, 2008 14:25
Caught at your own game!
The Prime Directive is my blog.
-
Hierophant - Seditious Bastard
- Posts: 28118
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 08:05
- Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by MustangGT » Mon Dec 01, 2008 14:29
Francois Tremblay wrote:Caught at your own game!
I know. I'm so ashamed...
NoDeity wrote: Every thinking, morally responsible individual ought to hold him/herself above the law.
Centurijohn wrote: Hm, I think the one where you go to jail for things like murder or sexual assault is quite alright.
NoDeity wrote: I, too, make the judgement that laws prohibiting murder and other violations of the person are generally in accordance with proper morality.
Centurijohn wrote: Hm, I think the one where you go to jail for things like murder or sexual assault is quite alright.
NoDeity wrote: I, too, make the judgement that laws prohibiting murder and other violations of the person are generally in accordance with proper morality.
-
MustangGT - Modular atheist
- Posts: 6102
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 09:22
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Thorsmitersaw » Sat Dec 06, 2008 07:21
Francois Tremblay wrote:There is nothing offensive about it. In fact, I find your rejection of it offensive.
brilliant argument Franc
-
Thorsmitersaw - (Dilettante)
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 09:47
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Hierophant » Sat Dec 06, 2008 13:30
That's a stupid thing to say. Emotion is not an argument.
The Prime Directive is my blog.
-
Hierophant - Seditious Bastard
- Posts: 28118
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 08:05
- Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Thorsmitersaw » Sun Dec 07, 2008 00:01
Francois Tremblay wrote:That's a stupid thing to say. Emotion is not an argument.
are you referring to your own "argument"? You should be
-
Thorsmitersaw - (Dilettante)
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 09:47
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Hierophant » Sun Dec 07, 2008 01:12
Once again, it was not an argument. I never said I was arguing. You are the one who assumed I was. Stop insulting me for something I did not do.
What is your game?
What is your game?
The Prime Directive is my blog.
-
Hierophant - Seditious Bastard
- Posts: 28118
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 08:05
- Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Thorsmitersaw » Sun Dec 07, 2008 03:17
what the hell is YOUR game, you didn't answer any of the mans questions or oppositions,
proceeded to ask why he asked about what he did,
he gave his reason for it
then you just continued to derail it
I am NOT the only person who recognizes this pattern in your posting Franc
proceeded to ask why he asked about what he did,
he gave his reason for it
then you just continued to derail it
I am NOT the only person who recognizes this pattern in your posting Franc
-
Thorsmitersaw - (Dilettante)
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 09:47
Re: Use/Occupancy rules of Ownership: Why?
by Hierophant » Sun Dec 07, 2008 03:25
What question did I not answer?
The Prime Directive is my blog.
-
Hierophant - Seditious Bastard
- Posts: 28118
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 08:05
- Location: Wenatchee, WA
38 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to Libertarian Socialism
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests